Political Control In Han China And Imperial Rome Essay

Han mainland China and Imperial Rome were amazing empires in their own way. Both of these civilizations had ways of maintaining the policy-making curb over their people. Han China and Imperial Romes method in political comptroller has many differences and similarities, but I believe there are more similarities than differences.Han Chinas political control was large. This empire developed a political philosophy called legalism. Legalism advocated clear rules and harsh punishwork forcets as means of enforcing the post of the state. With this new philosophy, Shihuangdi decided to launch a military campaign to unify China. This empire besides believed military force was very important. Han Chinas leading figure was an emperor. In their government, religion often took the major use in their society. Han China also had more equality in political control than Imperial Rome.Imperial Romes political control was mainly based on social status. For instance wealthy men dominated over wom en, and poor men. They had a written code of natural law that offered plebeians (poorer class) protection from abuse. This gave the plebeians an opportunity to shape public policy. Romans took great pride in this, and believed they enjoyed greater freedom than most of their neighbors. They had a rule of law, the rights of citizens, the absences of pretension, upright moralistic behavior, and keeping ones word. This was later recognized as the way of the ancestors.Once these empires political control were established, they shared many similarities. Both of them worked to unite the empires and create peaceableness among them. They also both believed the gods helped them rule and succeed as an empire. Both of these civilizations also had a custom religion, Christianity in Imperial Rome, and Buddhism in China. Roman and Chinese authorities both had supernatural sanctions to support their rule. Romans began to regard their deceased emperors as gods and made a religious cult. Roman auth orities persecuted the refusing Christians that didnt come to part.