The Media and Violent Crime :: Media Argumentative Persuasive Argument

The Media and Violent Crime      An issue that some(prenominal) corporate executives ignore is the possibility thataggressive people seek reinforcing stimulus for their own destructive acts.  Television frenzy, for instance, and the widespread public concern sequential it feature led to calls for strict controls on the depiction of convulsive programs.      In their decision making, some producers do not take responsibility for theevery bit important minority.  Instead, they may gear their content toward themasses, who crave sexually transp atomic number 18nt and violent action.  Fortunately, this grouphas the ability to disseminate violent action rationally, realizing that inreality, people who commit acts of violence have to compensate for their actionsby victorious full responsibility for the harm they cause others.      Not every angiotensin converting enzyme can write out fact from fantasy.  No t only is it theirrational people who commit the crimes in our country, but our own children whomay errantly be learning from day one that nothing bad will happen to them ifthey shoot their brother in the head with Daddys pistol.      Studies show that in one week of content outline of prime-time output onseven New York City channels, there were 3,421 acts and threats of violenceobserved.  Childrens fictional entertainment programs had three times thefrequency of violent acts or threats recorded in adult programs.   (Gunter,p.13).  many of these acts were committed without any pay for theaction without responsibility, then it must be acceptable behavior.  Similarly,aggressive adults be seeking reinforcement for their own anti-social behaviorfrom seeing attractive idiot box characters behave in the same way.      Behavioral evidence has indicated that the anti-social effects of violenttelevision portrayals are strongest and are most likely to occur amongindividuals who are already aggressive.  (Palmer, p. 10).      The ethical question is, should television submit to mass woo or takeinto consideration the affects on certain members of society, includingchildren?  The consequences of televising violence are not only harmful to some viewing audience but concurrently affect the television stations in the form of loss ofviewers and possibly gaining a bad reputation.  There are many sources,including viewers associations and prevalent journalism, which have beencondemning the depiction of violence in television programs as a potentiallydangerous and anti-social act on the part of those who counterbalance and transmitprograms.  (Gunter p. 2).  Still, even though these associations have beencondemning television violence, their efforts have had little effect on thelarge money-making corporations.  Therefore, the decision, on the part of thosein charge of th e programs, should be one of social responsibility.      In his article, Sex and effect, Joe Saltzman states, If, as producers