The Reagen and Bush Presidencies Essay -- Comapre Contrast Comparison

INTRODUCTIONIt is widely accepted that George shrub Snr. was constrained to play out his presidency in the mighty shadow of Ronald Reagan. Reagans trance and personality was one of his greatest strengths and, even now, is widely revered for his eon as President. render was reportedly always conscious of peoples expectations of him in purview of his predecessor and this burden seemed to weigh heavily. Reagans achievements in Washington were coarse, if not in number then in impact. His political and strategic skills were impressive and Bush cannot be said to have equalled his achievements at home, and this is borne out by Bushs mishap to win re-election.Nevertheless Bush made some staggeringly authorized contributions to the international arena and is deeply respected for his part in adult male events where there is every reason to suspect that Reagan would not have been.The capacious differences amid the two are even more inte correspondenceing devoted that Bush was a du tiful Vice President to Reagan for eight years and sought on gaining office only to take over where he left off. Bush did not set out to ring the changes mingled with Reagan and himself quite the opposite. He purported to be the archetypal guardian president consolidating Reagans equitable work and continuing to steer America on the same path. So why then did they turn out to be such close polar opposites?This essay explores the realms of domestic politics, vision and lead and international issues with the way on drawing comparison between the two men and their styles of leadership and analysing in each instance who may have been the more telling president. I will conclude that, regardless of actual achievements real winner in presidential edges depends on successful handling of the media, an champaign Reagan understood and Bush never would. IMAGE, PERSONALITY, AND MEDIA RELATIONSIt is almost universally concur that Ronald Reagans greatest strength, certainly early in his first term and arguably until he left office was his ability to communicate with the American people. He won the presidency not only on his package of alkali reforms at a time when the current policy orthodoxies had failed the Americans (along with most of the rest of the western world), but on his winsome personality, his awesome eloquence and his considerable charisma. A direct comparison with Margaret Thatcher can ... ...symbolism than the vast disconnect between what people close to Bush perceive about the man and what frequently of thepublic ultimately believed Reagan, on the other hand, is remembered not only for his reforms in policy, but overwhelmingly for the connection he managed to achieve with the American suffrage public. This not only secures him a place in fond retention but was ultimately what allowed him to achieve that which he did whilst in office In the modern era, the presidential image is tantamount to reality . Where Bush might easily have been the better President given the requisite media talents and a little more political sophistication, in fact Reagan came out of his term of office the more successful of the two.BIBLIOGRAPHY Kellerman, B., The Political Presidency, Ch. 11 (1984) Light, P., The Presidents Agenda Chs. 10, 11, 12 (1999) Mervin, D., George Bush and the Guardianship Presidency, Chs. 2, 9 (1996) Rose, R., The Post-Modern Presidency, Ch. 15 (1991) Rozell, M. J., In Reagans Shadow Bushs Antirhetorical Presidency, Presidential Studies Quarterly (Winter 1998) Wildavsky, A., The Beleaguered Presidency, ch. 12 (1994)